为什么.net MVC源代码ControllerBuilder使用委托来分配控制器工厂?:
private Func<IControllerFactory> _factoryThunk; public void SetControllerFactory(IControllerFactory controllerFactory) { _factoryThunk = () => controllerFactory; }
为什么不能直接分配ControllerFactory?,即:
private IControllerFactory _factory; public void SetControllerFactory(IControllerFactory controllerFactory) { _factory = controllerFactory; } public void SetControllerFactory(Type controllerFactoryType) { _factory = (IControllerFactory)Activator.CreateInstance(controllerFactoryType); }
解决方法
_factoryThunk目前被定义为Func< IControllerFactory>的原因这是支持两种重载的通用方法:
void SetControllerFactory(Type); void SetControllerFactory(IControllerFactory);
第一个的实现使用_factoryThunk是一个Func的事实,通过使用Activator来懒惰地实例化Type来声明Func inline:
this._factoryThunk = delegate { IControllerFactory factory; try { factory = (IControllerFactory) Activator.CreateInstance(controllerFactoryType); } catch (Exception exception) { throw new InvalidOperationException(string.Format(CultureInfo.CurrentUICulture,MvcResources.ControllerBuilder_ErrorCreatingControllerFactory,new object[] { controllerFactoryType }),exception); } return factory; };
因此,其他重载看起来像是一个虚假的实现的原因是,因为_factoryThunk被声明为Func,你建议的行甚至不会编译:
_factoryThunk = controllerFactory;
_factoryThunk是一个Func< IControllerFactory>而controllerFactory是一个IControllerFactory – 不兼容的类型.